Connect with us

Actualités

Are we living in a new Tunisia?

insatpress

Published

on

[simplicity-save-for-later]

The past several weeks, there has been a raise of awareness and consciousness touching the people of Tunisia. The call for cleaning campaigns and the support for 619 has been all over the place. An unexpected wave that we didn’t see coming. Yet, is this a good indicator or just a usual trend bound to fade in the coming days? 

It goes without saying that 2019 was the year of democracy for Tunisians. For the first time people felt responsible and conscious of what is going around. Their civic spirit was at its peak as people were sharing  pictures of their blue fingers. After the new president’s announcement, the spirit of a better Tunisia was more than ever needed. People were repeating that a new president is not the only way for the betterment of our country but what we actually need is a new state of mind, a new mentality. 

With this thought in mind, people created pages on Facebook with posts that show how national consumerism is vital, how the cleanliness of places is important and how much we need to change our behavior. With a new alerted mind Tunisians responded to the call.

 The question to be asked is: Is this for the long term? It is true that nothing made me happier and prouder than seeing youngsters cleaning trash from our streets and stations. Nothing made me more joyful than seeing artworks everywhere. (Even though for future paintings, you should ask a specialist before doing anything). But, I still have that feeling of doubt. It does not take only a  number of people nor a day for a country to become better. It needs days and regular attentiveness for everyone. My hope is that this awareness goes beyond hashtags,Instagram stories and Facebook posts to become a way of life. A Tunisian’s way of life!  

 

By Salma Alkhayat

Share your thoughts

Actualités

Trump’s plan : A diplomatic shift or a humanitarian crisis ?

insatpress

Published

on

[simplicity-save-for-later]

By

What is going on ? What is happening ? Where are we ?

Are we moving towards a world where peace is an illusion , where the rights of the oppressed are systematically ignored and where forced displacement becomes an acceptable strategy ? The latest news from the Middle East paints a grim picture. Israel has openly backed Donald Trump’s plan and ordered its military to prepare for the mass departure of Palestinians from Gaza → a move that raises pressing humanitarian , legal and geopolitical concerns.

How does this go against international law and human rights ?

The Fourth Geneva Convention’s Article 49 forbids « individual or mass forcible transfers » of protected persons from occupied territories, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) upholds the right to freedom of movement and the right not to be arbitrarily deprived of one’s home. If carried out, the forced displacement of Palestinians would be a blatant violation of international law undermining the Palestinian people’s sovereignty and making their decades-long struggle pointless.

The decision is seen by many as part of a larger geopolitical plot to undermine Palestinian resistance , portraying it as a lost cause rather than a legitimate struggle for sovereignty and human rights and it has the potential to erase the sacrifices made by generations of Palestinians who have fought for self-determination.

What does Trump see? Is it political gain or strategic intentions ?

According to Trump , this approach is in line with his strategic goals and ideological position. His administration , which has its roots in his « America First » philosophy , has frequently supported close ties with Israel in the name of maintaining regional stability. He would contend that by dividing warring factions and eliminating conflict zones, moving Palestinians would open the door to lasting peace. Critics , however , believe that this is only a front for more fundamental political goals, such bolstering American power in the Middle East and winning over pro-Israel lobbyists before the next election.

– In addition, Trump has a history of making decisions on his own without holding meaningful diplomatic talks. Although he frames his plan as a peace initiative , its unilaterality and disdain for Palestinian opinions raise questions about whether it actually seeks to ease tensions or imposes a predetermined solution that benefits Israel and the United States.

Why did Egypt’s Sisi resist the plan ?

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi rejected any proposal that would involve the depopulation of Gaza , reaffirming Egypt’s commitment to Palestinian self-determination and territorial integrity. Egypt has historically played a crucial role in mediating Israeli-Palestinian tensions and has consistently opposed any solution that undermines Palestinian sovereignty. In a significant regional response to the Trump-backed plan , Sisi refused to meet with Trump if discussions included the exploitation of Palestinian territories.

→ This rejection demonstrates the growing uneasiness among Arab leaders who perceive Trump’s proposal as a grave danger to the stability of the region. Egypt , which is already dealing with economic difficulties and internal security issues , sees forced relocation as a trigger for additional instability that could lead to regional turmoil.

Global reactions : a divided international response Countries like France and Germany have reiterated their support for a two-state solution , warning that such a move could fuel extremism and destabilize the region. Europe and human rights organizations have strongly condemned the policy , calling it an outright violation of Palestinian sovereignty and an obstacle to peace. The wide range of reactions to the plan reflects deep global divisions.

While some U.S. politicians criticize Trump’s approach, others, especially those with strong pro-Israel affiliations , defend it as a strategic move to ensure regional stability.

Meanwhile, Arab countries remain at a crossroads, with some such as Saudi Arabia and Jordan cautiously expressing opposition to any forced displacement while others have yet to take a firm stance. The potential consequences of their decisions will have a significant impact on future diplomatic relations with Israel. On the other hand , Israel’s Western allies, especially the United States, have tried to frame the plan as a necessary security measure.

Conclusion: a precarious turning point !

Netanyahu’s support of Trump’s Gaza plan marks a dramatic change in Israeli policy with far-reaching effects on the region. Although it has the potential to change the geopolitical landscape, it is still unclear how this bold move will affect Palestinians and international relations in general. As reactions from around the world develop , it will be difficult to predict whether it will lead to a lasting peace or further entrench divisions and spark conflict. The fate of Palestine cannot be decided unilaterally and any attempt to do so runs the risk of escalating tensions rather than resolving them.

 

Written by roukaya berbeche

Share your thoughts

Continue Reading

Made with ❤ at INSAT - Copyrights © 2019, Insat Press