Connect with us

Review

Review | Joker

insatpress

Published

on

[simplicity-save-for-later]

Lauréat du Lion d’or à la Mostra de Venise en 2019, Joker a déchaîné les passions cinéphiles du monde entier avant même de sortir en salle.
Dans l’histoire des personnages de DC Comics transposés au cinéma, Joker est une sorte de révolution. Non seulement un superhéros n’y tient plus le haut de l’affiche mais le réalisme brutal y prend le pas sur les amorces du fantastique.

Ceux qui ne jurent que par l’histoire des comics risquent d’être déçus, ceux qui n’aiment pas les films de super-héros seront ravis.

Collé à l’asphalte, Joker plonge le spectateur dans l’univers vicié de Gotham City qui ressemble comme deux gouttes d’eau à New York à la fin des années 1970; jonché de détritus et infesté de rats. Un univers où la pauvreté se voit à chaque coin des rues et l’aide sociale se réduit comme peau de chagrin.
Joaquin Phoenix, qui a lancé sa carrière avec Gladiator en 2000, interprète dans Joker Arthur Fleck, un homme pauvre et malade de Gotham City.
Méprisé de tous, humoriste raté, obligé de travailler comme homme-sandwich et victime des agressions incessables dans la rue alors qu’il est déguisé en clown. S’en suit une escalade fatidique vers la folie et la vengeance qui conduit Arthur Fleck à devenir l’un des personnages les plus emblématiques et reconnus dans la culture populaire : le Joker.

Arthur Fleck ressemble très peu au Joker des comics. L’absence de Batman y est pour beaucoup car sans antagoniste à affronter, Arthur Fleck doit s’affirmer seul pour affronter ses démons intérieurs.
D’une maigreur inquiétante, volontairement , parfois lourdement, mise en scène à grands renforts de plans qui s’attardent sur son corps très maigre, Joaquin s’approprie avec maestria ce personnage culte et donne tout : son corps, son âme et le reste (du sang, des larmes). Le genre d’interprétation qui marque à jamais une carrière. Il est à la fois triste, pathétique et dérangeant avec ses fous rires, à glacer le sang, tout en apportant une autre dimension au « Joker ».

Dans ce rôle énorme, Joaquin Phoenix fait des étincelles.
Le Parisien souligne “une mise en scène étonnante et une performance ahurissante de Joaquin Phoenix”. Et Le Monde dit de Todd Phillips qu’il filme “une version sociopoétique du personnage, incarné magistralement par Joaquin Phoenix”.
Joaquin Phoenix interprète la lutte contre le mal, les démons intérieurs.
Cette géhenne fait ravage en lui et petit à petit, prend le dessus jusqu’à atteindre une apogée sans retour.
L’on assiste à une tragédie émouvante qui laisse, une fois terminée, place à un sentiment mitigé. On est passé par un maestrium d’émotions : de la tristesse à la compassion puis de la compassion à la compréhension.

Joker est un film extrêmement puissant, viscéralement contemporain. Puissant dans l’immense prestation de Joaquin Phoenix toute la complexité du drame qu’il met en scène. 2 heures semblent longues parfois ennuyantes mais les dernières 30min sont bluffantes sur tous les plans.

Pour finir Joker soulève une multitude de questions. Ce qui peut être parfois la preuve qu’on a eu affaire à un grand film, libre à l’interprétation. Mais là, les questions s’accumulent parce que la moralité du film est impossible à saisir.

Naît-on tueur ? Peut-on avoir de la pitié pour un assassin qui a été martyrisé ? Est-ce
la faute de « la société » si un homme profondément perturbé devient un meurtrier ?
Pourquoi faire de Joker un martyr ?

A vous de le dire.

 

Ecrit par Nihed Nouri.

Share your thoughts

Continue Reading

Events

JTI The Fourth Dimension: Jokes Till Idleness

Avatar

Published

on

[simplicity-save-for-later]

By

Overview

April 7th, 2021: the most awaited date here at INSAT for the fifth JTI edition organized by the « THEATRO INSAT ».

In these new theatrical pieces, the club chose to preserve the same concept: a group of plays with musical breaks and the same fine thread that all of these sketches have in common. However, since the last edition of JTI, the world has faced so many changes due to the coronavirus pandemic that turned it into a flophouse.

The audience’s high expectations are completely natural as the past events were an utter success, since the first edition of 2017.

This even explains why this year’s event was announced as ‘sold out’ two days after the start of the selling.

JTI: A flashback to the last decade

« Freedom » is the overall theme discussed and shown throughout the three performed plays, it is what most of the characters longed for: the chance to breathe, the chance to see what’s beyond, and to break the political chains imposed by society. But how can these one-dimensional[1] characters convey this ideal?

The event kicks off with the storyteller style, a history professor lecturing his student while chewing on the same consumed jokes. That’s how our story initially begins.

1st piece: Bay al-Hana

Bay Al-Hana was a political statement evidently which aimed to address the issues of freedom throughout Tunisian history, showing the juxtaposition between what was politically present back at that time and the hope that the population, presented in the character of Hsine primarily, had for the better tomorrow.

The play starts with the bay and his second wife talking about the future of the kingdom and its heir, in a dialogue breaking mostly the fourth wall between the audience and the characters, acknowledging their own inexistence but mostly filled with cliché jokes and sexual overtones that made it feel like a deja vu moment during the performance. The same pace continued with the same lousy writing and dialogue that even with the outstanding performance by the whole crew couldn’t overlook its downfalls in the middle of the piece making it lose its charm which made the audience disorientated from the longevity of the play.

Bay al-Hana was an exceptional piece that touched the core of the Tunisian society’s contradictions and habits, politically and ethically, showing the unchanging traits that still exist nowadays through a writing style that made the old characters speak modern words; This was accurately seen through Fatma’s monologue when she was brought forcibly to the Bay and in an emotional scene built by the effect of the lighting and the right music, the delivered speech was able to convey the real emotions and pain that the character felt back then.

Adding to that, the amazing lights, the beautiful sound, and the outstanding performance by the actors contributed to the development of Hsin’s character in the following sketches and gave the audience the opportunity to challenge their minds over the theme.

2nd piece: a political prisoner

This piece is complex since it contains more than just one story inside its twists and turns. Despite its primary focus on Hsin’s character, it also shone the light over the other characters in the play, giving them enough time and space to express themselves which adds to the story told from Hsin’s point of view.

The story is happening in prison, where Hsin is being tortured every now and then by the dictatorship’s police officers over a past expressed opinion until a final verdict gets published. Thanks to the intense performance of the actor playing Hsin’s role, we could sense the melodrama around the story and the pain felt by the character,  along with the painful eagerness of that unfed hope mentioned in the first play. Hsin encounters throughout his time in prison a religious man, a criminal who killed his pregnant wife and a young student. Yet only the young man was put under the spotlight. Because of one « alleged » mistake, this character lost his future due to the political system’s injustice. This side-character evoked a very controversial topic inspired by the events that occurred a couple of months ago.

The last part of this piece started with a mediocre and lackluster scene to the story about Hsan and his wife only to end with the highlight performance of the evening through Hsin’s emotional heartbreaking monologue that took the audience to that extra mile of vulnerability.

Despite the system’s unfairness, Hsin’s loyalty to his country covered the missteps and misconceptions of the whole play.

3rd piece: chismha mart il thour

« What’s it called the wife of the bull » is the last piece of the event, not the most emotional nor the funniest but the most original as it presents a new concept foreseeing the future situation of the Tunisian people after the destruction covid-19 left.

Despite its promising premise, this play only felt the most rushed, muddled, tedious, and uninspired, as it never coalesces into a meaningful story neither about the loss of fertility nor about the revolution nor why it was happening in the first place.

Shout out to the actor Mohamed Elyes who carried this whole piece on his shoulder through his spectacular acting and delivery of lines. Thanks to his strong sense of humor, he was more than able to pull the whole piece off and sail it safe to the shore.

The story tells how fertile men became rare species. They were abused and needed to break away from their misery and suffering in order to find their own identity and freedom in a world filled with hypocrisy and materialistic exploitation of the human race.

Conclusion

Around a year ago, covid-19’s outbreak isolated billions of people and killed millions of them, and thus, changed their lives. After such a major event, using the virus in dirty jokes is simply immature. That’s why the last decade is haunting us back until we learn that the times have changed and we surrender this mentality of cheap laughs.

To conclude,  I just want to thank every member of « Theatro INSAT » for the great work they’ve done and their beautiful performance in front of a live audience.

Also, I’d like to highlight the fact that the directorial view was obvious from the start revealing the well-crafted plot and the thread that connects all the dots together. All in all, it pinpoints the effort, sweat, tears, and huge amount of love this edition was made of.


[1] lacking in depth and development.

Share your thoughts

Continue Reading

Made with ❤ at INSAT - Copyrights © 2019, Insat Press